For more than a week these samples are up and no comments ... This is not about the awesome Natalia Forrest . She is great at what she does , whether it's here in sexy nylons & lingerie , or doing her "dirty talking" monologue video's .
I didn't want to knock them when they were literally down last week with no shoots because of the weather. But they're back now and I'll be the bad guy then , pointing to the orange elephant in the OAS house.
Overall, the photographers are doing a pretty good job , it's not like the Orange Years of OAS where they ruined 30-40 % of the sets , but I notice them dropping the ball more often , so it's time to wack 'em on the fingers . In the last year I again see more under lit and over lit (or under & over exposed) pics and the orange skin devil , nothing like they used to do , but still a must mention. Now I get they want to create a more "romantic" scene with less light or under exposure (and "warmer" colours) , but that really sucks out the detail in black or darker lingerie & nylons. Sure you can easily brighten the pic so that the darker parts are better but then the skin part gets overly bright . Of course you can photoshop the dark parts alone , to make them better .... but what are we doing then here ? I thought OAS-LN-AL was to enjoy looking at hot glamour models in sexy lingerie (think: spank-bank) , not a photoshop challenge (or other picture software). Over exposure is even worse , as is over saturation of the colours. It just wipes out all detail , no matter how much you try. Correcting an average OAS set , incl some cropping , resizing , colour correction and brightness , cost me half an hour to an hour ... that is more than it takes to make the set at the house !
Back to Natalia here . Just like her September 2016 shoot forums.onlytease.com/read_thread.cfm/ForumID/20/ThreadID/1611372/Thread/37025, they do it again. I hear the excusses : yeah but Natalia's skin is more tanned ...or the camera settings were the same , BS . Sloppy work !!
Natalia's first day : the pretty good :
> could have been a touch brighter.
The bad :
> this one borderline.
Nat's second day : the good
The bad :
I'm just showing a few , you can judge the others on the 2 sample pages and the Art-lingerie sample thread.
Look at Rebbeca G's pics of the same day >> much better .
Look at AL : compare Nat's pics with Samantha's pic just below. Yes some of Samatha's are over lit .
I try not to point out those errors/sloppiness every time I see them but Natalia's sample pics are the straw that broke this camel's back.